DigiClass/Categories that need work: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(see also) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There are arguably categories that should be added, others that should be removed, others that should be linked to each other, either in a category-subcategory relationship or a simple cross-reference. | There are arguably categories that should be added, others that should be removed, others that should be linked to each other, either in a category-subcategory relationship or a simple cross-reference. | ||
* See also [[DigiClass/To do list]] | * See also [[DigiClass/To do list|to do list]] | ||
==Categories to add== | ==Categories to add== | ||
Revision as of 14:56, 25 May 2023
There are arguably categories that should be added, others that should be removed, others that should be linked to each other, either in a category-subcategory relationship or a simple cross-reference.
- See also to do list
Categories to add
Categories to be edited
Categories of dubious value
- category:Projects (arguments for dropping: laborious to populate, difficult to maintain; arguments for keeping: can be used to disambiguate projects from, say, tools; designed to populate a full list of all projects described in the Wiki (as in the menu bar))
- category:Creativecommons (why drop?: zero members, difficult to populate and maintain; should be replaced by a more accurate "open license" tag or similar; why keep?: )
- catgeory:Epigraphyandpapyrology (duplicate of category:Epigraphy and papyrology) (deleted)
- category:Epigraphy and papyrology (split into category:epigraphy and category:papyrology) (deleted)
Categories to cross-reference
- Egyptology has four subcategories, but those four categories don't point upward to the parent category, or to each other (of value only selectively).