Talk:Classical Language Toolkit

Categories

I am not sure CLTK should be under the category 'programming', or many other projects should be under 'programming' otherwise. I am not sure of what should go under that category, but I find that the articles in there are very heteregoneous. (SilviaStopponi) 22:32, 22 November 2023 (CET)

I agree this isn't clear. I suspect the purpose of the Programming category—which could indeed be better explained in the category description—was to capture projects or tools that involve user-facing programming code, like the python libraries of NLTK and CLTK, or that are used for writing code, like the code editors currently listed, Jupyter, etc. If this were more clearly expressed, I think CLTK would be a good fit for this category, don't you @SilviaStopponi? GabrielBodard (talk) 10:43, 23 November 2023 (GMT)

Sorry if I see this reply only now. Yes, I agree that the problem is the definition of the Programming category... (SilviaStopponi) 22:13, 10 July 2025 (CET)