Difference between revisions of "Talk:Unicode for ancient languages"

From The Digital Classicist Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(updates needed)
 
Line 2: Line 2:


Could anyone add to the summary of Unicode ranges of interest to digital classicists? E.g. from TLG proposals or Dumbarton Oaks vel sim.? [[User:GabrielBodard|GabrielBodard]] ([[User talk:GabrielBodard|talk]]) 11:40, 24 October 2018 (BST)
Could anyone add to the summary of Unicode ranges of interest to digital classicists? E.g. from TLG proposals or Dumbarton Oaks vel sim.? [[User:GabrielBodard|GabrielBodard]] ([[User talk:GabrielBodard|talk]]) 11:40, 24 October 2018 (BST)
:: this seems fairly complete for Greek. There are mentions of the successful 2004 TLG proposals, as far as I can see. It only treats Greek extensively. Adding some Latin numismatics and other circum-Mediterranean languages [[User:ElliMylonas|ElliMylonas]] ([[User talk:ElliMylonas|talk]]) 16:57, 1 December 2020 (GMT)

Revision as of 16:57, 1 December 2020

Updates needed

Could anyone add to the summary of Unicode ranges of interest to digital classicists? E.g. from TLG proposals or Dumbarton Oaks vel sim.? GabrielBodard (talk) 11:40, 24 October 2018 (BST)

this seems fairly complete for Greek. There are mentions of the successful 2004 TLG proposals, as far as I can see. It only treats Greek extensively. Adding some Latin numismatics and other circum-Mediterranean languages ElliMylonas (talk) 16:57, 1 December 2020 (GMT)