Digital Critical Editions of Texts in Greek and Latin

From The Digital Classicist Wiki
Revision as of 15:52, 8 March 2007 by NevenJovanovic (talk | contribs) (→‎Medieval: Umlaute & acutes)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A working bibliography

Classical (Greek and Latin)

  • Homer and the Papyri (editors: Casey Dué, Mary Ebbott, John Lundon, Dimitrios Yatromanolakis). A database of the textual variants found in a large number of Homeric papyri
  • Galenus' commentary on Hippocrates' "On the articulations" (editor: Christian Brockmann). C. Brockmann has published this digital critical edition within the frame of the Corpus Medicorum Graecorum-Latinorum Project
  • Claudian (editor: Michael Hendry). Like the following edition of Propertius, this is not a real digital critical edition (based on a declarative markup language encoding the textual variants), but an HTML-based presentation of a traditional critical edition, with an essential critical apparatus
  • Propertius (editor: Michael Hendry).

Biblical

  • The Online Critical Pseudepigrapha project. Electronic editions of the best critical texts of the Old Testament Pseudepigrapha and related literature. All texts are encoded in XML (not TEI-compliant). The following are critical editions (i.e. have an in-line apparatus criticus): Enoch (editor: Ken Penner); Testament of Adam (editor: Ken Penner); The Testament of Job (editors: Ian Scott, with Ken Penner and David Miller).
  • Digital Nestle-Aland Prototype (Universit�t M�nster). A real digital critical edition of the first and second Epistle of John, based on a complete digital transcription of 24 manuscripts. The New Testament Transcripts Prototype, cured by the same University, features a digital critical edition of the whole New Testament, but based on a number of manusripts variable from 2 to 26.

Medieval

Neo-Latin

Links to other sitographies

A larger commented sitography (in Italian) on digital philology can be found in the 'E-Philology' section of the Digital Variants site (editor: Cinzia Pusceddu). Almost all the projects quoted here belong to medieval or modern philology. A comment on C. Pusceddu's sitography, with a focus on the Classics (in Italian, again) is here.