Inscriptional palaeography in a multilingual province (Stoyanova) - Revision history

GabrielBodard: see also

2018-11-12T11:18:03Z

see also

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:18, 12 November 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	PhD research, 2013-~~2018~~ (approx.)		PhD research, 2013-2019 (approx.)

	* Student: Simona Stoyanova		* Student: Simona Stoyanova
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Does exploring and presenting Greek and Latin inscriptions through DigiPal make the carrying out of the research more efficient, in what ways and to what extent? Would it allow scholars to present new questions and look at existing ones from new perspectives? What would be the significance of presenting an inscription as a single visual whole, with its setting, decoration and layout? Could we talk about reinstating the text in its original context, or does the analysis of specific letterforms fragment the reading even further? Does the application of DigiPal to Greek and Latin inscriptions offer a valuable insight into the project’s potential?		Does exploring and presenting Greek and Latin inscriptions through DigiPal make the carrying out of the research more efficient, in what ways and to what extent? Would it allow scholars to present new questions and look at existing ones from new perspectives? What would be the significance of presenting an inscription as a single visual whole, with its setting, decoration and layout? Could we talk about reinstating the text in its original context, or does the analysis of specific letterforms fragment the reading even further? Does the application of DigiPal to Greek and Latin inscriptions offer a valuable insight into the project’s potential?

			==See also==

			* [[DigiPal]]
			* [[Archetype]]

	[[category:projects]]		[[category:projects]]

GabrielBodard: category sort value

2016-06-08T11:07:08Z

category sort value

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:07, 8 June 2016
Line 14:		Line 14:

	[[category:projects]]		[[category:projects]]
	[[category:dissertations]]		[[category:dissertations\|Stoyanova S Inscriptional]]
	[[category:epigraphy]]		[[category:epigraphy]]
	[[category:palaeography]]		[[category:palaeography]]

GabrielBodard: GabrielBodard moved page Inscriptional palaeography in a multilingual province to Inscriptional palaeography in a multilingual province (Stoyanova): adding name to dissertation title

2016-06-08T11:06:46Z

GabrielBodard moved page Inscriptional palaeography in a multilingual province to Inscriptional palaeography in a multilingual province (Stoyanova): adding name to dissertation title

← Older revision	Revision as of 12:06, 8 June 2016
(No difference)

GabrielBodard: cat

2016-01-15T12:23:06Z

cat

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:23, 15 January 2016
Line 16:		Line 16:
	[[category:dissertations]]		[[category:dissertations]]
	[[category:epigraphy]]		[[category:epigraphy]]
			[[category:palaeography]]

GabrielBodard: struct; institution; supervisors

2016-01-04T16:57:25Z

struct; institution; supervisors

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:57, 4 January 2016
Line 2:		Line 2:

	* Student: Simona Stoyanova		* Student: Simona Stoyanova
	* Supervisors: Peter Stokes and ~~Charlotte Roueché~~		* Institution: King's College London (Digital Humanities and Classics)
			* Supervisors: Peter Stokes and Irene Polinskaya

	===Abstract===		==Abstract==

	My research explores the influences and relations between the Greek and Latin epigraphic traditions in the Roman province of Thrace (modern southern Bulgaria, northern Greece and Turkey). The Greek epigraphic tradition was already widespread throughout the region. By the time of the Roman conquest, the local population, a large part of which was Thracian, was already bilingual, using Thracian and Greek. The arrival of the Latin language and epigraphic tradition in the 1st century A. D. caused inevitable changes. The analysis of internal processes and the relationship between the changes in both languages could give us a clearer picture of the curious epigraphic situation in Thrace (examples include bilingual funerary inscriptions with Latin nomenclature and Greek verse, or Greek inscriptions put up by Roman officials in Roman colonies).		My research explores the influences and relations between the Greek and Latin epigraphic traditions in the Roman province of Thrace (modern southern Bulgaria, northern Greece and Turkey). The Greek epigraphic tradition was already widespread throughout the region. By the time of the Roman conquest, the local population, a large part of which was Thracian, was already bilingual, using Thracian and Greek. The arrival of the Latin language and epigraphic tradition in the 1st century A. D. caused inevitable changes. The analysis of internal processes and the relationship between the changes in both languages could give us a clearer picture of the curious epigraphic situation in Thrace (examples include bilingual funerary inscriptions with Latin nomenclature and Greek verse, or Greek inscriptions put up by Roman officials in Roman colonies).

GabrielBodard: Created page with "PhD research, 2013-2018 (approx.) * Student: Simona Stoyanova * Supervisors: Peter Stokes and Charlotte Roueché ===Abstract=== My research explores the influences and rela..."

2014-04-04T15:49:51Z

Created page with "PhD research, 2013-2018 (approx.) * Student: Simona Stoyanova * Supervisors: Peter Stokes and Charlotte Roueché ===Abstract=== My research explores the influences and rela..."

New page

PhD research, 2013-2018 (approx.)

* Student: Simona Stoyanova
* Supervisors: Peter Stokes and Charlotte Roueché

===Abstract===

My research explores the influences and relations between the Greek and Latin epigraphic traditions in the Roman province of Thrace (modern southern Bulgaria, northern Greece and Turkey). The Greek epigraphic tradition was already widespread throughout the region. By the time of the Roman conquest, the local population, a large part of which was Thracian, was already bilingual, using Thracian and Greek. The arrival of the Latin language and epigraphic tradition in the 1st century A. D. caused inevitable changes. The analysis of internal processes and the relationship between the changes in both languages could give us a clearer picture of the curious epigraphic situation in Thrace (examples include bilingual funerary inscriptions with Latin nomenclature and Greek verse, or Greek inscriptions put up by Roman officials in Roman colonies).

To facilitate the palaeographic aspect of the research, I plan to build a customisation of DigiPal, The Digital Resource for Palaeography, for the use of epigraphers. Its potential for mapping, cataloguing, tracing patterns, processing and analysing scripts and hands in manuscripts can be extremely helpful for managing epigraphic material.

Does exploring and presenting Greek and Latin inscriptions through DigiPal make the carrying out of the research more efficient, in what ways and to what extent? Would it allow scholars to present new questions and look at existing ones from new perspectives? What would be the significance of presenting an inscription as a single visual whole, with its setting, decoration and layout? Could we talk about reinstating the text in its original context, or does the analysis of specific letterforms fragment the reading even further? Does the application of DigiPal to Greek and Latin inscriptions offer a valuable insight into the project’s potential?

[[category:projects]]
[[category:dissertations]]
[[category:epigraphy]]