OSCE Programme

Friday 22nd September 2006, Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London

7 Arundel Street, London, WC2R 3DX (map)

Digital Editions and the Philologist

 * argument: The agenda and research goals of philologists need to be kept in mind—even if modified and enhanced—when using digital technologies to create, edit, and study texts.


 * presenter: Charlotte Roueché ( OSCE Roueche Paper)


 * responder: Stephen Oakley

Markup

 * argument: XML (and within it especially TEI) offers both a solid standard for text markup as well as limitations which have to be managed in a collaborative framework. Depth of markup may be a hindrance as well as an advantage of this technology.


 * presenter: Gabriel Bodard ( OSCE Bodard Paper)


 * responder: Notis Toufexis ( OSCE Toufexis Response)

eScience/VRE/Grid

 * argument: the eScience methodologies offer a powerful technological framework for digital research. These technologies need to be exploited for digital authoring, collaborative text editing, wide dissemination, and effective processing of available texts.


 * presenter: Stuart Dunn ( OSCE Dunn Paper)


 * responder: Nathan Lea

Depth and Scale

 * argument: The computational analysis of digital editions needs both a large enough corpus and a degree of deep encoding&mdash;any given textual project needs to find its own balance between these two. The field as a whole and any repository need to be able to accept and handle texts with a minimal layer of markup as well as more richly encoded versions.


 * presenter: Gregory Crane ( OSCE Crane Paper)


 * responder: Melissa Terras

Collaboration

 * argument: Large-scale digital projects make it possible, and even essential, that scholars work together to achieve multi-disciplinary work that is entirely within no one person's expertise. There are managerial and technological issues to be addressed with any collaborative project.


 * presenter: Ross Scaife ( OSCE Scaife Paper)


 * responder: Simon Mahony

Licensing/Open Source

 * argument: Scholarship has always depended on transparency and availability of source texts and arguments, and these features need to be carried over into legal licensing of digital editions.


 * presenter: Sayeed Choudhury ( OSCE Choudhury Paper)


 * responder: Brian Fuchs ( OSCE Fuchs Response)

Registries/referencing

 * argument: The proliferation of different kinds of critical digital texts need to be identified according to a standard registry&mdash;even if the hosting is distributed&mdash;if protocols of referencing are to be usefully consistent.


 * presenter: Neel Smith ( OSCE Smith Paper)


 * responder: Juan Garcés ( OSCE Garces Response)

Authority/Peer Review

 * argument: Digital editions, particularly in a collaborative framework, need both traditional means of quality assurance and new approaches.


 * presenter: Daniel Deckers / Lutz Koch ( OSCE Deckers Paper)


 * responder: Dolores Iorizzo

Summary and further topics to be discussed

 * chair: Juan Garcés

Values of traditional scholarship

 * chair: Brian Fuchs

Future Strategies

 * chair: Gregory Crane