Difference between revisions of "Digital Publication: advantages and disadvantages"

From The Digital Classicist Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(added "Transparency/Iteration")
(updated DM 4 url)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=== What makes a digital publication useful? ===
+
=What makes a digital publication useful?=
  
 
(answer in note form)
 
(answer in note form)
  
=== Accessibility ===
+
==Accessibility==
  
 
* cf. <span class="wikiexternallink">[http://perseus.tufts.edu/ Perseus]</span> user figures as compared to books in a physical library
 
* cf. <span class="wikiexternallink">[http://perseus.tufts.edu/ Perseus]</span> user figures as compared to books in a physical library
Line 10: Line 10:
 
* web accessible to new audiences who might never read a classics book otherwise
 
* web accessible to new audiences who might never read a classics book otherwise
  
=== (Almost) unlimited size/space ===
+
==(Almost) unlimited size/space==
  
 
* not limited by page size and volume thickness
 
* not limited by page size and volume thickness
Line 20: Line 20:
 
** appendices
 
** appendices
  
=== Media ===
+
==Media==
  
 
* images; colour photos; scalable/zoomable images
 
* images; colour photos; scalable/zoomable images
Line 26: Line 26:
 
* interactive media: "game-like" walkthroughs of archaeological sites
 
* interactive media: "game-like" walkthroughs of archaeological sites
  
=== Hyperlinking ===
+
==Hyperlinking==
  
 
* internal linking: text to footnotes (and back); cross references to notes, glossary, appendices, bibliography
 
* internal linking: text to footnotes (and back); cross references to notes, glossary, appendices, bibliography
Line 34: Line 34:
 
* mirroring external projects
 
* mirroring external projects
  
=== Updating/Work in progress ===
+
==Updating/Work in progress==
  
 
* "Oh great, that means you can update every day, right?"
 
* "Oh great, that means you can update every day, right?"
 
* Stability issues; citable publication
 
* Stability issues; citable publication
  
=== Transparency / Iterative research ===
+
==Transparency / Iterative research==
  
 
* source code (cf. Open Source model of scholarship)
 
* source code (cf. Open Source model of scholarship)
Line 45: Line 45:
 
* indices as output and research tool
 
* indices as output and research tool
  
(to be continued)
+
==Collaboration / Community building==
 +
* digital publication can be done by people scattered all around the world
 +
* an "open source" digital publication (somewhat similar to Wikipedia) can attract collaborators willing to invest time and energy in making the publication better
 +
 
 +
(Notes above partly reflect [https://journal.digitalmedievalist.org/articles/10.16995/dm.19/ Bodard 2008].)
  
 
[[Category:FAQ]]
 
[[Category:FAQ]]

Latest revision as of 18:09, 4 April 2019

Contents

[edit] What makes a digital publication useful?

(answer in note form)

[edit] Accessibility

  • cf. Perseus user figures as compared to books in a physical library
  • Scholars/students outside of major universities, especially in developing world where libraries can not afford obscure/expensive titles
  • costs per unit are lower (or free); development costs usually not higher
  • web accessible to new audiences who might never read a classics book otherwise

[edit] (Almost) unlimited size/space

  • not limited by page size and volume thickness
  • can expand abbreviations/conventions/glossary (improve accessibility to non-specialists)
  • can include multiple versions of text/image/media
    • ToCs
    • indices
    • images
    • appendices

[edit] Media

  • images; colour photos; scalable/zoomable images
  • multimedia: audio files, video, flash, VR, etc.
  • interactive media: "game-like" walkthroughs of archaeological sites

[edit] Hyperlinking

  • internal linking: text to footnotes (and back); cross references to notes, glossary, appendices, bibliography
  • clickable 'thumbnail' images with full images in pop-up
  • cross-references to external projects
  • importing of data from external projects (dynamic, repurposing)
  • mirroring external projects

[edit] Updating/Work in progress

  • "Oh great, that means you can update every day, right?"
  • Stability issues; citable publication

[edit] Transparency / Iterative research

  • source code (cf. Open Source model of scholarship)
  • check sources
  • indices as output and research tool

[edit] Collaboration / Community building

  • digital publication can be done by people scattered all around the world
  • an "open source" digital publication (somewhat similar to Wikipedia) can attract collaborators willing to invest time and energy in making the publication better

(Notes above partly reflect Bodard 2008.)

Personal tools